There is only ONE way in which Linux should copy Windows

Get 100$ credit for your own Linux server:

Get 300€ off the Slimbook TITAN with offer code titan-laptop-nickfan:

? SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:
Get access to an exclusive weekly podcast, vote on the next topics I cover, and get your name in the credits:

YOUTUBE:

Patreon:

Or, you can donate whatever you want:

? FOLLOW ME ELSEWHERE:
I also do a Gaming Podcast:

Join us on our new Discord server:

Twitter :

My Gaming on Linux Channel:

? GEAR I USE:
Sony Alpha A6600 Mirrorless Camera:
Sigma 56mm Fixed Prime Lens:
Logitech MX Master 3 Mouse:
Bluetooth Space Grey Mac Keyboard:
Logitech Brio 4K Webcam:
LG Curved Ultrawide Monitor:
Logitech White Speakers:
Xbox Controller:
*Amazon Links are affiliate codes and generate small commissions to support the channel*

00:00 Intro
00:40 Sponsor: 100$ free credit on your own Linux server!
01:52 Let’s not copy the architecture
03:29 User Interface does NOT have to be a Windows copy
05:43 Being more user friendly doesn’t make less choice
07:53 We can’t copy how Microsoft works on software either
10:54 We should copy Windows in THIS, though

Linux, as an operating system, is fundamentally different from Windows, no question about it, from its look to its architecture.

This can be confusing to people, as they’d expect another OS to be structured exactly like another one. For example, the filesystem on Linux doesn’t use C or D or E drives.

The most visible difference between Linux desktops and Windows is in the user interface. Whatever desktop you choose to use, it can only partially emulate what Windows looks like, and how it works, even if you try your hardest to make it into a carbon copy.

Familiarity in user interface is a good thing, it helps people get their bearings, and find what they’re looking for more easily. But there is a difference between being familiar, and being a copy.

Each feature, button and option doesn’t need to be in the same place as its windows equivalent, to be intuitive.

Of course we need to keep some conventions and not reinvent the wheel on every little detail. But we also don’t have to stick to the exact way windows does things, to have a usable, user friendly system.

Let’s talk about choice. Windows doesn’t offer their users choice. You can’t really refuse telemetry, you can’t change the position of the taskbar anymore, you can’t change anything but an accent color, it’s not a really customizable system.

Linux desktops, traditionally, offer a lot more choice. It’s not something that’s inherently part of Linux, it’s not a core value, it’s just something that we’ve gotten used to.

This is something that’s generally called fragmentation by detractors of the Linux desktop, but I personally think that this choice is a strength.

Does it mean we should be like Windows, and not offer any choice? One distro, one desktop, 10 colors, and that’s it? Of course not.

Linux desktops have a very different philosophy compared to Windows. We’re using an open source system, with free software, developed by volunteers, or people being paid by companies working on open source software.

Microsoft is a monolothic corporation than employs their own developers, doesn’t open the source code to Windows, and sells the OS to hardware partners.

This means that the direction our OS and theirs are moving towards might be similar, but the way to get there isn’t, and shouldn’t be.

Both Microsoft and Linux desktops have a vision that they follow, but they don’t reach it in the same way. Linux desktops shouldn’t try to have the same organization as Microsoft.

Last but not least, let’s talk about the ways of getting Windows, versus how you’d get a Linux desktop.

Windows is generally preinstalled on a computer you buy. Not many people decide to buy a Windows installer, or DVD, and install it themselves.

Linux doesn’t have that luxury, and comes as a download that you have to install yourself.

And this is a spot where we should DEFINITELY try to be like Windows. Yep. There’s ONE area where we NEED to copy Windows, and that’s having computers in retail stores. .

Concluzion: There is only ONE way in which Linux should copy Windows – linux,elementary os,open source,distribution,linux distro,linux help,linux 2021,linux tutorial,linux different from windows,linux should be like windows,linux and windows differences,differences between linux and windows,what are the differences between linux,linux should be more like,linux shoul be,gnome should,kde should,linux is windows,linux isn’t windows,should linux be more like windows,how is linux different from,how is linux,why linux

source